Scarlett Johansson Upset By ChatGPT Voice – AI-Tech Report
Upon hearing Johansson’s claims, OpenAI stepped forward with their side of the story. They confirmed the approach to Johansson but emphasized that the voice in question was that of a professional actress, not an imitation of hers.
Acknowledgment of Contact
OpenAI admitted they had indeed approached Johansson. It wasn’t a shot in the dark after all. But what about the voice?
Defense of the Voice Actor
OpenAI insisted that the voice was from a professional actress and not intended to imitate Johansson. They maintained it was a coincidence, underscoring their commitment to ethical deployment of AI.
Legal and Industry Impact
This incident isn’t just a celebrity showdown with technology; it reverberates through the legal and creative industries. Johansson’s case epitomizes broader societal tensions over AI’s rapid advances and raises important questions about intellectual property and creative rights.
AI and Creative Industries: Strained Relationships
The relationship between AI and creative industries has been complicated. While AI offers powerful tools, it also poses threats to the authenticity and autonomy of human creativity.
Sag-Aftra’s Campaign for Rights
The Screen Actors Guild (Sag-Aftra) has been vocal about federal intellectual property rights for image, voice, and likeness. Johansson’s situation amplifies the urgency of these campaigns.
The No Fakes Act
Proposed as a bipartisan bill, the No Fakes Act aims to protect performers from unauthorized digital replicas. If passed, it could prevent other celebrities from facing similar issues.
Potential Legal Actions Johansson Could Pursue
Given the gravity of the situation, Johansson has hired legal counsel and may potentially have a strong basis for a right of publicity claim.
Hiring Legal Counsel
Johansson’s decision to hire legal representation signals she is not taking this matter lightly. It hints at the complex legal landscape she’s about to navigate.
Right of Publicity Claim
She might argue that her likeness, even if unintentionally, has been used without consent, which infringes on her right of publicity – a key legal spearhead against unauthorized commercial use of one’s persona.
Precedent from the Bette Midler Case
Johansson’s claim finds roots in the Bette Midler case, where Midler sued Ford Motor Company for using an impersonator. This precedent articulates the laws on vocal likeness and unauthorized use.
Conclusion: Growing Legal Battles Around AI Use
The legal battles around AI’s use and its implications for personal rights are expected to continue growing. Johansson’s case is just one of the many potential legal and ethical dilemmas that will shape our understanding of technology’s place in society.
Continued Scrutiny
This incident will likely lead to increased scrutiny and perhaps new legislation to protect individuals against unauthorized use of their likeness by AI.
Future Outlook
As AI continues to advance, balancing innovation with respect for individual rights will be more crucial than ever. The boundaries of this balance are still being drawn in cases like Johansson’s.
The convergence of human creativity and artificial intelligence is an evolving narrative, and how we address these challenges today will set the precedents for tomorrow. So, what do you think the future holds for AI and the way it interacts with our lives and identities?